Nicolas E.
|
Posted by: Pieter Bervoets (NL) on 29.1.2013 18:49:40 (UTC)
Posted by: Donald Stark (US) on 26.1.2013 16:48:38 (UTC)
That is the Electric AAA main system correct? only the A Main gets the 3 races to settle the final.
That would be cool for those guys. Ill never be in the A Main but for those top 10 that is a great Idea.
All Mains get 3 runs, but you cannot improve fiurther than your own Main. You will be racing against racers of your own level in the lower Mains, so that should be more interesting as well, especially now that we have the Replay files available where you can watch your own virtual race with the opponents in your final.
[/b][/quote]
My proposal was indeed 3 finals for all, no chance to bump, but all of them counting with points.
As the ABC model is in place, why do we need so many phases in a race. I'd say free practise, qualification and final should be enough. No need to restraint on number of racers, everyone gets his 3 final runs, from final A to Z, so everybody has same event duration.
|
Pieter BFounder
|
Posted by: Donald Stark (US) on 26.1.2013 16:48:38 (UTC)
That is the Electric AAA main system correct? only the A Main gets the 3 races to settle the final.
That would be cool for those guys. Ill never be in the A Main but for those top 10 that is a great Idea. [/b]
All Mains get 3 runs, but you cannot improve fiurther than your own Main. You will be racing against racers of your own level in the lower Mains, so that should be more interesting as well, especially now that we have the Replay files available where you can watch your own virtual race with the opponents in your final.
|
Donald SRace reporter
|
Posted by: Nicolas Evens (BE) on 20.1.2013 12:02:08 (UTC)
Imho the best would be to mimic real life completely, so finals of 10 drivers, 3 runs per final, every run counting with point system.
That is the Electric AAA main system correct? only the A Main gets the 3 races to settle the final.
That would be cool for those guys. Ill never be in the A Main but for those top 10 that is a great Idea.
|
Lucio C.
|
Sorry, I do not get this
For lower rounds (not the Main final), the ranking will be done by overall results. You can improve to a higher heat or main final in the next round. For example, if you start in heat 5 (41-50) and finish 18, you will be in heat 2 or B-Main with start position 8 in the next round
Could U explain further?
|
Donald SRace reporter
|
Every part of this new system is amazing..... VOD is just what the doctor ordered..... Nice work!
|
Nuno L.
|
Posted by: Pieter Bervoets (NL) on 25.1.2013 16:50:51 (UTC)
The event ranking system has been changed.
For lower rounds (not the Main final), the ranking will be done by overall results. You can improve to a higher heat or main final in the next round. For example, if you start in heat 5 (41-50) and finish 18, you will be in heat 2 or B-Main with start position 8 in the next round.
For the Main final round the ranking will be done per final of 10. For example, if you finish 3rd in the D-Main, your event ranking will be 33, you cannot finish better than 1st place in your final.
Season 1 Round 3 events will be ranked with this system.
The Weekly's have just 1 round and do not use the ABC system.
Great, VRC is getting better
|
Pieter BFounder
|
The event ranking system has been changed.
For lower rounds (not the Main final), the ranking will be done by overall results. You can improve to a higher heat or main final in the next round. For example, if you start in heat 5 (41-50) and finish 18, you will be in heat 2 or B-Main with start position 8 in the next round.
For the Main final round the ranking will be done per final of 10. For example, if you finish 3rd in the D-Main, your event ranking will be 33, you cannot finish better than 1st place in your final.
Season 1 Round 3 events will be ranked with this system.
The Weekly's have just 1 round and do not use the ABC system.
|
Nicolas E.
|
Imho the best would be to mimic real life completely, so finals of 10 drivers, 3 runs per final, every run counting with point system.
|
Jostein S.
|
Oh I'm sorry for that misunderstanding, yes I meant 1 or 2 days, not half a day. I see now it looks like a half, just in my head it was otherwise hehe. Glad you like it :)
Edited by author: 20.1.2013 11:42:22 GMT
|
Fred F
|
Posted by: Jostein Smidt (GB) on 20.1.2013 0:26:20 (UTC)
What's the problem of an event running for a while?
There is certainly a misunderdstanding, I'm not against the event running on two weeks, it's the opposite, I'm against a shorter event with Finals running on only half a day, but I think I found it : when you said "1/2 days" in a previous post, were you saying "1 or 2 days" or "half a day" ?
I thought it was half a day because Reece Hodges answer you like it was "half a day", and I was afraid that with this system, lots of people would have miss some runs.
If it's two days for each Final, then I'm all for this
Posted by: Jostein Smidt (GB) on 20.1.2013 0:50:09 (UTC)
My suggestion:
Quali - 3 days
semi final - 2 days
D final - 2 days
C final - 2 days
B final - 2 days
A final - 2 days
OK for that !
Edited by author: 20.1.2013 11:38:06 GMT
|